The Dual Impact of Trade Wars on Emerging Market Economies: A Study on the Link between Economic Growth Volatility and Global Influence

Authors

  • Chuhan Song

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v9n2.19

Keywords:

Trade War, Emerging Market Economies, Economic Volatility, Global Influence

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the US–China trade war on emerging market economies (EMEs), with a specific focus on how it has exacerbated economic growth volatility and shaped strategic positioning. Using a mixed-methods approach, we construct two composite indices-the Economic Volatility Index and the Global Influence Index-via principal component analysis (PCA), drawing on data from five representative EMEs (Brazil, India, South Africa, Turkey, and Vietnam) between 2013 and 2021. We identify a moderate negative correlation between global influence and economic volatility at the aggregate level, yet country-level analysis unveils substantial heterogeneity: nations with greater influence exhibited milder volatility, whereas less influential economies experienced intensified instability. After the trade war, driven by national heterogeneity, the divergence trend among different countries has become further pronounced. These findings underscore the dual role of the trade war as both an economic disruptor and a strategic catalyst, highlighting how domestic policies and economic structures mediate its effects. This study offers novel insights into the resilience and adaptive strategies of EMEs in an era of great-power competition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bartak, J., Jabłoński, Ł., & Jastrzębska, A. (2021). Examining GDP Growth and Its Volatility: An Episodic Approach. Entropy, 23(7), 890. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23070890 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e23070890

[2] Bhowmik, R., & Wang, S. (2020). Stock Market Volatility and Return Analysis: A Systematic Literature Review. Entropy, 22(5), 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050522

[3] Bishnoi, V. (2019). Make in India initiative: A key for sustainable growth. South Asian Journal of Marketing & Management Research, 9(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-877x.2019.00013.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-877X.2019.00013.4

[4] Brainard, L., & Martinez-Diaz, L. (2009). Brazil as an Economic Superpower?: Understanding Brazil’s Changing Role in the Global Economy. Brookings Institution Press.

[5] Braveboy-Wagner, J. (2016). Diplomatic Strategies of Nations in the Global South The Search for Leadership. New York Palgrave Macmillan Us :Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45226-9

[6] Chea, A. C. (2023). Global Marketing: Emerging Market Economies’ Challenges, Opportunities and Effective Marketing Strategy for Success. Business and Economic Research, 13(4), 103–103. https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v13i4.21482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v13i4.21482

[7] Chen, G., Dong, X., Minford, P., Qiu, G., Xu, Y., & Xu, Z. (2021). Computable General Equilibrium Models of Trade in the Modern Trade Policy Debate. Open Economies Review, 33(2), 271–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-021-09631-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-021-09631-9

[8] Chen, Z. (2022). Research on International Trade Theory and the Status Quo of World International Trade. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12(6), 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2022.126057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2022.126057

[9] Cheptiş, A. (2022). The impact of external shocks on economic growth: An empirical study based on the SVAR models. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 16(1), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2022-0062

[10] Choi, B. Y., & Nguyen, T. L. (2023). Trade diversion effects of the US–China trade war on Vietnam. Pacific Economic Review, 28(4), 570–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12435

[11] Chunga, J. P., & Yu, P. (2024). The impact of external shocks on volatility persistence and market efficiency of the foreign exchange rate regime: evidence from Malawi. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03957-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03957-8

[12] Ibrahim, S. G., Ahmet, A., & Sheriff , A. I. (2021). China and the Future of Africa Continental Free Trade Area (ACFTR): Challenges and Opportunities - African Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development (AJESD). African Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.52589/AJESD-OVPKTDUY DOI: https://doi.org/10.52589/AJESD-OVPKTDUY

[13] Jena, D., Akash, C., & Gupta, P. (2024). Deflecting economic sanctions: do trade and political alliances matter? International Economics and Economic Policy, 21(3), 543–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-024-00616-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-024-00616-w

[14] Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016). Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2065), 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202

[15] Kapustina, L., Lipková, Ľ., Silin, Y., & Drevalev, A. (2020). US-China Trade War: Causes and Outcomes. SHS Web of Conferences, 73(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207301012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207301012

[16] Khurshid, I. (2023). Modi’s US Foreign Policy: Strategic Autonomy Redefined. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 60(1), 002190962311733-002190962311733. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231173395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231173395

[17] Kvangraven, I. H. (2023). Dependency theory: strengths, weaknesses, and its relevance today. In : A Modern Guide to Uneven Economic Development (pp. 147–170). Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976541.00013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976541.00013

[18] Lowy Institute. (n.d.). Global Diplomacy Index. Https://Globaldiplomacyindex.lowyinstitute.org. https://globaldiplomacyindex.lowyinstitute.org/

[19] Maćkowiak, B. (2007). External shocks, U.S. monetary policy and macroeconomic fluctuations in emerging markets. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(8), 2512–2520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2007.06.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2007.06.021

[20] Namkoong, Y. (1999). Dependency Theory: Concepts, Classifications, and Criticisms. International Area Review, 2(1), 121–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/223386599900200106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/223386599900200106

[21] Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027697

[22] Ripsman, N. M. (2021). Globalization, deglobalization and Great Power politics. International Affairs, 97(5), 1317–1333. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab091

[23] Sakarya, B. =, Polat, O., & Ertuğrul, H. M. (2025). Revisiting inflation inertia: A comprehensive analysis of dynamics and connectedness in the Turkish case. Central Bank Review, 25(2), 100199–100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2025.100199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2025.100199

[24] Tian, Y. (2023). The Trend of China-US Strategic Competition and Chinese Domestic Public Opinion about Sino-US Relations from Trump to Biden. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 6(1), 986–993. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/6/20220946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/6/20220946

[25] Turhan, E. (2025). Turkey as a “Geopolitical Other”: The Construction of European Identities in the Geopolitical Era and its Implications for EU–Turkey Relations. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.10028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.10028

[26] United Nations Peacekeeping. (n.d.). Troop and police contributors. United Nations Peacekeeping. https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/troop-and-police-contributors

[27] Voeten, E., Strezhnev, A., & Bailey, M. (2009). United Nations General Assembly Voting Data. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/lejuqz

[28] Wang, Y., & Laufer, D. (2024). A cross-disciplinary review of crisis spillover research: Spillover types, risk factors, and response strategies. Public Relations Review, 50(3), 102411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102411

[29] Winkler, S. C. (2023). Strategic Competition and US–China Relations: A Conceptual Analysis. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poad008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poad008

[30] Word Bank. (n.d.). Global Financial Development | DataBank. Databank.worldbank.org. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/global-financial-development

[31] World Bank. (n.d.). World Development Indicators. The World Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

[32] Zhang, W.-B. (2008). International trade theory : capital, knowledge, economic structure, money, and prices over time. Springer.

[33] Zhao, M. (2025). Geopolitical Impacts of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Opportunities and Risks Across Asia, Africa, and Europe. Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences, 164(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.20735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.20735

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Song, C. (2025). The Dual Impact of Trade Wars on Emerging Market Economies: A Study on the Link between Economic Growth Volatility and Global Influence. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 9(2), 168-181. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v9n2.19